This modus operandi is unacceptable.

You feel that we need a new modus operandi here.

That would, of course, enable us to change the whole modus operandi between us in the future.

We want scenarios and coherent planning.

They have to obtain planning permission.

It requires careful planning, training and not least funding.

I think that will make the financial planning even more transparent.

In addition, there is the issue of land - use planning.

This direct contract procedure must not catch on and become the predominant procedure.

Specifically, we must simplify the procedure in order to prevent the blocking of the budgetary procedure.

And if the reason for this is the complexity of the procedure, perhaps we ought to review that procedure.

But we say   'no'   to replacing the cooperation procedure with the consultation procedure.

The testing procedure is inefficient.

Consider, in addition, technology, information technology and the different cultures.

It is a new technology and it is only a good new technology if a lot of people can use it.

The second area is technology.

That is not being technology - neutral.

Any new technology is just a tool.

They constitute a balanced approach between a total prevention and a permissive approach.

We should try to analyse when a new approach directive can be used vis - à - vis old approach directives.

We are looking now to see great changes in their internal approach and in their external approach.

A strategic approach is needed.

I find that approach interesting.

Perhaps this is a promising avenue to explore, but we must also explore others.

Sweden has chosen another method, a successful method where alcohol policy is concerned.

We need a method, the convention method that many here have already mentioned.

The method applied is the open coordination method.

The method used should be the   'bottom - up'   method.

We need a different method.

Existing legislation, however, prohibits or hinders this type of cash management technique.

Belgium has started to use such a measuring technique in the wake of its dioxin crisis.

In our opinion the right way forward is another way.

19397 I believe we can find a way through and a positive way forward, but only if everyone cooperates.

It is evolving not only in a positive way, but also in a negative way.

Exchanging lists in this way is not an ideal way to engage in dialogue.

In this way, the limited available resources could be used sensibly and in a targeted way.

An application for a document would challenge the application of the exception.

There are instances of incorrect application.

Their application so far has gone nowhere.

We are partial in our approach and application.

It is about the extraterritorial application of domestic legislation.

We do not believe that the end justifies the means but that the means prefigure the end.

No democracy means no stability, and no stability means no economic recovery.

There are ways and means of objecting, there are ways and means of expressing your objection.

Next, democracy means transparency.

It is a means of occupation.

If we introduce a process such as the conciliation process, then there must be a reason for that process.

We see enlargement as a process of partnership, not a process of " them and us ".

It advocates accelerating the liberalisation process as well as the process of applying pressure to wages.

This is about maintaining the peace process and the peace process is today at stake.

This is a codecision process.

The target figure system or the quota system is not a system which only applies to women.

The quota system, therefore, is not a system specifically designed for women.

The system for producing sugar from sugar beet is a self - financing system.

As a result, the poison goes into the system and, as it does, it destroys the system.

Fourthly, the transport system.