This assessment certainly includes some positive aspects.

Risk assessment must start where the problems starts.

That is my assessment of the conciliation procedure.

The checking and assessment mechanisms have been decidedly inadequate.

Reliable risk assessment requires comprehensive analyses and reference measurements.

Scientific advances are mind - boggling.

This is unacceptable to my mind.

This must be borne in mind.

So various areas come to mind.

I do not mind underpinning the market.

24160 In my opinion, this is due to the opinion that it is especially buildings that must be registered.

I fully share their opinion.

I agree with this opinion.

That is a very sensible opinion.

Finally, we welcome this opinion.

I want to see civil society given a louder voice.

Once again, we add our voice to this positive request.

It is extremely important in our own interests that we speak with one voice.

At times, perhaps, their voice drowns out some of the other groups, in my judgment.

It is up to that country to voice its concerns.

That is how matters stand, however.

Please stand and observe this minute's silence.

The facts stand, and they are appalling.

That is not how things stand, however.

That is what we stand to lose.

It will take some years for changes to take effect.

We must take stock and take serious action to cut carbon dioxide emissions.

It is this matching process which may only take hours but in some cases can take months.

In the interests of all industries that rely on the coast we have to take action, and take it now.

No, we must take that   'no'   vote seriously and take it on board in our reflections.

Mine is my religious belief.

Religion and belief are not separate entities.

Our belief is that the two systems can coexist.

It strains my belief in the principle of subsidiarity.

Managerial and executive staff will give corporate shape to this belief.

It is clear that activities that are unlawful off - line will not cease to be unlawful by going on - line.

I went out on a trap line.

The political line therefore remains unchanged.

I object to this line of reasoning.

28854 This line no longer exists.

Yesterday the whole position changed with the position the Commission has taken on the legal base.

This position is illogical.

That is the official position.

The opposing position is unrealistic.

Our position must be intelligible.

The very intensive debate on external rating made that abundantly clear.

There is a good home rating scheme developed in my own constituency which should be far more widespread.

2844 It is not the establishments but the instruments which should have a high rating.

It is important that we know who the actors are and what their credit rating is.

I take a more relaxed view.

A global view is required.

I completely share that view.

I support the latter view.

I share your point of view.