It is, in fact, an international agreement and a trade agreement.

This is fundamentally a development cooperation agreement dressed up as a fishing agreement.

The final agreement will be an association agreement not a mere trade deal.

Moreover this agreement is not, as was said by other rapporteurs earlier, only an economic agreement.

The present agreement is a kind of pre - pre - agreement, but with a view to joining in future.

They object to family unity.

You also mentioned unity in diversity.

We are a group of unity in diversity.

There must be unity and coherence in this respect.

Thirdly, it is engendering greater division rather than unity.

That was the consensus, and this consensus was reached here.

There is a consensus on that.

We have a consensus on that.

Everyone involved agreed on this consensus.

There was no such consensus previously.

So, on the subject of unanimity and majority, cultural questions always require unanimity.

Fundamental areas still require unanimity.

This current procedure requires unanimity.

This is based on consensus, unanimity.

Unanimity cannot be limited to constitutional decisions.